Doctor Prevails in Suit Against Griper

A district court in Indiana recently entered a judgment for a plastic surgeon against a former patient who complained on the Internet that her facelift led to breathing problems.  Among other things, the former patient, since deceased, allegedly impersonated the doctor by posting under his name and creating websites with his name in the URL and/or title. 

The doctor’s suit alleged defamation, false light, disparagement, and a trademark claim for false designation of origin.  Professor Eric Goldman argues that the court erred in determining that the patient used the doctor’s name in a commercial context – a necessary element of a trademark claim.  Regardless, the case together with the recent In Re: Anonymous Online Speakers case, suggests that judges may exhibit less tolerance for gripers who intend to inflict economic injury or seek commercial gain for themselves in conjunction with airing their grievances.

Previously on Post or Perish:  Man Bites Dog?  Close:  Doctor Sues Patient

This entry was posted in Defamation, Intellectual Property and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Doctor Prevails in Suit Against Griper

  1. Pingback: Controversial Cyber-Bullying Statute May Benefit Businesses | Post or Perish

  2. Pingback: Go Search Yourself | Post or Perish

  3. Pingback: Legal Risks Facing New Media Publishers « The National Law Forum

  4. Pingback: Fraud Claim Against Mass E-Personator Survives Dismissal | Post or Perish

  5. Pingback: Juvenile Court Upholds Conviction for Facebook E-Personation | Post or Perish ®

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s